Council hit back at Hull KR in row over North Stand delays

Trusted article source icon
Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Profile image for HDMsportsed

HDMsportsed

HULL City Council have hit back at Hull KR following their criticism of the new North Stand development, saying they won't be blamed for the club's 'financial difficulties'.

It comes as Rovers officials today labelled the new £8m development 'shambolic' and claimed repeated delays had cost the club between £750,000 and £1m in revenue.

  1. The new North Stand takes shape at Craven Park.jpeg

    The new North Stand takes shape at Craven Park.

Rovers chairman Neil Hudgell said failings over the development, for which he blames the council and project managers NPS - a company part-owned by the authority - had put an extra financial strain on the club.

But in a second statement on the issue today, the council said Rovers had been involved in every step of the development, and questioned why they had now publicly attacked the work.

***Free smile and gum health check*** NATIONAL SMILE MONTH MAY...

St Andrews Dental Care

View details

Print voucher

Free smile and gum health check
we are taking part in national smile Month 2013 come and visit us at St Andrews Dental care for a free smile and gum heath check.

Terms: EVERYONE IS WELCOME!
SPEAD THE WORD TO FAMILY AND FRIENDS.
free sample goodie bag and competitions to enter with great prizes to be won.
Complimentary refreshments available.
phone: 01482225689
Email: theteam-standrewsdentalcare@hotmail.com

Contact: 01482 423152

Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013

"We are disappointed at our North Stand project team colleagues from Hull KR for not flagging up problems they had with the North Stand project earlier, on designs that they have signed off with us at every stage of the development," said the council statement.

"We are also disappointed that they have used this to blame us for their financial difficulties. We have no responsibility for the running of the finances of the club.

"Changes requested to the design, have led to the 4-5 weeks slippage, which is not uncommon for a project of this size and we believe that the stand will be better than the original design. The club has been part of this process.

"Also we have already committed to addressing issues of concern to us and the wider project board, such as the colour of the stand as part of the project board meetings.

"We have asked Hull KR to reconsider their position but they have refused."

52
Tweet this article
Report

52 Comments

  • Profile image for jezhull

    by jezhull

    Thursday, February 28 2013, 7:23PM

    “Absolutely laughable that prioryred and other numpties of his ilk still continue to end their half wit posts with a word that's supposed to represent BELIEVE !
    After all that's gone on please tell me that they don't continue to BELIEVE?
    How gullible can some people be? I guess that's an indication of why they inhabit east hull :-)”

  • Profile image for ginceloyal

    by ginceloyal

    Thursday, February 28 2013, 5:21PM

    “Tell ya what, keep having digs at each other whilst your own clubs are failing. It must block out the pain eh? Instead of digging the other club try rectifying your own clubs problems both on the pitch and ESPECIALLY financially by helping somehow. BOTH clubs are financially crippled as is the whole sport of Rugby League..........but don't let the facts stand in the way of a good niggle eh Haddock and everyone else.

    I guess it's the mentality of rugby league fans in Hull eh???”

  • Profile image for The_Haddock

    by The_Haddock

    Thursday, February 28 2013, 3:13PM

    “Abnormal norm,

    Let's get a few things straight about "spin" and where it's coming from shall we:

    THE NORTH STAND DEBACLE: As I see it this is in effect an office block and Community Centre (that's how they got the EU funding) which has a stand attached for Rovers to use. It is a council owned building, just like the KC. Rovers will benefit from the revenue from tickets and hospitality if/when they ever start to use it. Yes, they will pay a rent, but the revenue must outweigh the rental cost otherwise they would not be doing it would they. Rovers are not contributing anything to the building costs.

    Now a little test for you. Using the equation:

    Revenue – Costs = Profit

    Why don't you get your head together with Forest and Slammer and all the other numpties on here and do the maths. When you've finished (you will need at least a C in GCSE between you to work it out), why don't you come back on here and enlighten us as to why this is not a freebie for Rovers? I'll give you a clue, for it not to be a freebie, the answer to the above equation would have to be a negative number (that's one with a little dash in front of it).

    Now lets cover the so called subsidies being paid to FC by the SMC:

    CATERING: When FC where at the Boulevard, they benefited to the tune of around £70k I think from the catering within the ground. The agreement (contractual I assume) when they moved to the KC was that they should not be out of pocket as a result of the move. Therefore the equivalent amount is due to FC annually from the catering. This is an enticement NOT a subsidy.

    TICKETS PAID FOR BY THE SMC: When the stadium opened a number of Premier Tickets were sold. I don't know if these where for life or a fixed term. However the Premium Tickets enable the holders to attend not only the football but also the rugby and other events like concerts. Therefore some of the revenue from the sale of these tickets is for FC. This is an entitlement NOT a subsidy.

    Anyway, as the journo's say - let not let the facts stand in the way of a good story (and the North Stand debacle is great story!). Come on you Light Blues. Up the Blue T*Ts.

    Oh how we laughed!”

  • Profile image for kwright

    by kwright

    Thursday, February 28 2013, 1:36PM

    “gateshull thunder sharks est 1999 ,the club took over by the little club ,gateshead , the club who sold its name for money ,sharks ,the club that before the kc , where million in debt ,crowds of 5000 ,had the benefit of a council buying there dump ,10 years at the kc , still in debt ,the only club using its players as assets , a club with a whole team on banned drug ,a club who use to slate there now chairman when he was on the smc ,but open there arms when he suggested investment , bleat about been 2 nd class citizens at the kc ,slate the allams for his bias smc , then silence when he opens the books to show the benefits they really recieve off there hated other tenants , good old city helping the b graded sport team , you couldnt make it up ,and you say your proud ,lmao”

  • Profile image for abnormalnorm

    by abnormalnorm

    Thursday, February 28 2013, 1:28PM

    “Eddy (Sandra)

    What do your friends in the construction industry say about it?”

  • Profile image for PrioryRed

    by PrioryRed

    Thursday, February 28 2013, 1:23PM

    “Poor eddy off on one again, he probably had an too much navy cake last night.

    They are getting slack in Rampton Secure Hospital.

    BEL13VE

    lol”

  • Profile image for PrioryRed

    by PrioryRed

    Thursday, February 28 2013, 12:54PM

    “Poor eddy, no doubt slobbering over his keyboard again.

    It takes all sorts.

    BEL13VE

    lol”

  • Profile image for abnormalnorm

    by abnormalnorm

    Thursday, February 28 2013, 12:42PM

    “Finbarr

    "It's about time that someone stood up to the "spin" of some of the over-large personalities dominating sport in Hull."

    ADAM PEARSON?
    SHAUN McRAE?

    Can't write the word 'spin' without talking about these two.”

  • Profile image for abnormalnorm

    by abnormalnorm

    Thursday, February 28 2013, 12:41PM

    “Eddy (Sandra)

    Talking of BEGGARS dare to explain how you can spend 8 hours a day on this website every single day of the week?”

  • Profile image for PrioryRed

    by PrioryRed

    Thursday, February 28 2013, 12:37PM

    “I have to agree with Dr********, there is a lot of hype and wishful thinking emerging from the Gateshull (est.1998) Muppet's over this issue.

    I suppose it takes their tiny minds off the troubles their heavily subsided mongrel club is currently experiencing.

    BEL13VE

    lol”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article