Daughter ban lifted for dad who downloaded child porn by mistake
A MAN barred from being alone with his daughter after accidentally downloading child porn is celebrating after the ban was lifted.
Nigel Robinson, 43, had been trying to download an album when he opened files that turned out to be indecent images of children.
He told his wife immediately and then contacted Humberside Police to report the discovery on his laptop.
However, social services then told him he would only be allowed supervised access to his 8-year-old daughter Isabel until the laptop had been examined – something that would take up to a year.
IS YOUR CAR KEY BENT ? REMOTE FOB NOT WORKING ? LOST CAR KEYS ?...
Peace Of Mind Security Hull Ltd/Hull Car Keys
View details
FOR ALL YOUR CAR KEY NEEDS CALL US NOW ON
01482 423414
SNAPPED KEYS, LOST KEYS, KEYS LOCKED IN VEHICLES,
EXTRA KEYS
WE ALSO REPAIR 90% OF ALL REMOTES AND KEYS, NO FIX NO CHARGE.
Terms:
Terms: FREE REMOTE KEY FOB BATTERY ONE PER CUSTOMER
SAVE £3.00 WITH THIS FREE BATTERY
Contact: 01482 423414
Contact: 01482 423414
Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013
But within days of telling his story in the Mail, he was told the laptop had been examined and the ban had been lifted.
"I took her to the park on Saturday morning then went for a walk to shops just because we could," said Mr Robinson, who lives in Keyingham.
"It was a bit odd because I was told on Friday morning that it would be another couple of months before there would be a result. I was looking to the end of May before I could get an answer.
"But then I got a phone call in the evening from the head of child protection saying the laptop had been examined and there was no incriminating evidence.
"My heart skipped a beat, the relief was unreal, I felt absolutely brilliant. It is such excellent news."
Mr Robinson had been downloading the music at the beginning of November, attempting to listen to an album by former Guns N Roses guitarist Slash.
However, he says he ended up with a series of files labelled with girls names and quickly realised that he had indecent images of children.
After the Mail carried the story and it was followed up by the national media, Mr Robinson appeared on BBC Radio 2's Jeremy Vine show and was asked to go on ITV's This Morning to discuss his plight.
The police investigation led to the laptop being seized and sent off to be examined, with a force spokeswoman telling the Mail the examination process could not be expedited.
Mr Robinson said: "The ban was having a terrible impact on our family life, my wife and I were arguing more, I'd starting smoking heavily again and drinking a lot.
"I know it's no excuse, but the stress is difficult to deal with. A year is such a long time to not be able to be alone with your daughter.
"I have tried to be as open and honest as I possibly could be. I always took that approach and it has paid off in the end but there were still some people out there who thought there was something else going on."
A spokeswoman for East Riding Council confirmed Mr Robinson has been released from the conditions.
She said: "We take all allegations of a child protection nature passed to us by the police very seriously.
"East Riding Council has a duty of care to protect children and young people and this duty will always take precedent in these types of situations."
Humberside Police told the Mail it had "no control" over the amount of time it takes for the laptop to be examined.
However, a police spokeswoman said yesterday: "The examination of the laptop is complete and Mr Robinson will have it returned to him sometime this week, as it needs to be cleansed of the images."
10






Comments
by Defarge
Thursday, March 15 2012, 12:41PM
“The mealy-mouthed claptrap from Chief Constable Hollis published in the Hull Daily Mail the next day (15 March) on the page the paper likes to call "The voice of the People" is worth reading - if only as an example of mealy-mouthed claptrap.”
by barryrobin
Wednesday, March 14 2012, 4:20AM
“The problem now is that the next guy may decide not to tell the police and then be found out later. Then he will be assumed guilty.
Useless policing by an incompetent useless police force. If only they had more money, blah, blah, blah!!”
by audemars
Tuesday, March 13 2012, 11:12PM
“He was presumed guilty because he was suspected of one of the two premises that mean the police can do what they like - child protection or anti terrorism - either suspicion means the police can do what they like with little or no evidence - or even lock people up without trial indefinitely”
by thesnooper
Tuesday, March 13 2012, 7:26PM
“what an absolute load of rubbish, had this been a murder investigation that laptop would have been examined the same week, its disgusting that a member of the public reports a crime like the police want people to do and then becomes a victim themselves and with the possibility of of it bearing down on the family for a year.
i think i would seek legal advice on the basis he was treated as guilty right from the off and the fact it caused his family needless stress
the authorities should get their act together its not the firts time they have got things wrong”
by manchie44
Tuesday, March 13 2012, 5:28PM
“Didn't Pete Townshend do something similar ?
Where's the book Pete?”
by bigmamma107
Tuesday, March 13 2012, 4:06PM
“SO PLEASED FOR THE FAMILY”
by Basil__Fawlty
Tuesday, March 13 2012, 12:02PM
“Amazing, the lazy fuzz say that it will take a year to analyse the hard disc, then as soon as it gets in the news they say it has now been been examined. Pathetic, useless, incompetent.”
by NeilTheasby
Tuesday, March 13 2012, 11:31AM
“Common sense rules the day at last! And nice to see that Nigel is a Tigers fan. But how much precious public money has been wasted on this pointless "case"? Surely they've got other fish to fry. Somebody needs a bloody good dressing down over this.”
by localad
Tuesday, March 13 2012, 10:04AM
“Sollyatwell, yours is the bizarre statement, 'The police have no authority over any thing now'
Is there a point to that?? Do you assume that the police run everything, the country, the world?, Of course not, na di would imagine that these days there are so many computers laptops needing checking that there is a queue, nothing odd about that, and I would assume that depending on the seriousness of the case there will be a pecking order of whihc are done first. Yours was a very odd ill thought out post. As it turns out the computer was examined fairly quickly and the guy cleared, really do not see your point at all.”
by strummer1961
Tuesday, March 13 2012, 9:42AM
“Nice one big man.Just shows you that if you're not afraid to force the issue...You'll win.WELL DONE!!!”