No change in Murden charges decision
SIMON Murden's parents have been told the decision not to bring criminal charges against the police officers who killed their son won't be overturned.
Ken Macdonald QC, the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), met with Dorothy and David Murden this week to personally inform them he has not reconsidered his decision.
The invitation to meet the country's chief prosecutor came after the conclusion of the inquest into the charity worker's death in March, which cleared the officers involved of any wrongdoing.
Mr Murden, 26, of Spark Mill Lane, Beverley, died after being shot by firearms officers on the A63 on March 22, 2005.
He was suffering a psychotic episode and had driven his father's van the wrong way down the A63.
Mr Macdonald announced his decision not to bring criminal charges against the officers in October 2006.
However, at the conclusion to the inquest, he wrote to the Murdens to inform them he had not yet finalised his decision.
The family prepared a presentation in which they outlined the reasons they thought the officers should face a criminal court.
Today, Jim Wyatt, of Hamers Solicitors, who represents the family, confirmed Mr Macdonald had now finalised his decision.
He said: "In a private meeting, the Murden family were told by the DPP he would not be reconsidering his decision not to prosecute the officers.
"During this meeting the coroner's verdict was discussed. However, at this stage the Murdens want their discussions with the DPP to remain private."
Mr Wyatt said the Murden family are now pressing ahead with plans to meet with Humberside Police.
He added: "Following the inquest there were indications from Humberside Police that they would be prepared to meet and discuss ways forward and discuss the evidence."













30 Comments
View all
by xcalibr, Hull-ish
Monday, October 27 2008, 5:59PM
“Donna you sum up in a few words the whole tragedy of this event. Perhaps this man needed 'medical' help, family or other welfare support. The reality on this tragic day was he appeared to present a life threatening danger and did not respond to instructions - when they open fire police, and armed forces in similar situations like for example Gibraltar, shoot to kill that is the only way to be certain the threat is eliminated. I am afraid the 'just wing him' solution is a figment of boys adventure comics. It is unsavoury and unfortunate but that is what we ask these people to do on our behalf and with very little thanks.”
by pikeybob, hull
Monday, October 27 2008, 4:07PM
“they did right to pop a cap in this looneys ass!”
by donna, east riding
Monday, October 27 2008, 8:35AM
“why didnt they just shoot him in the leg to bring him down?
then arrest him and give him the medical care he clearly needed.”
by a woman, beverley
Sunday, October 26 2008, 5:47PM
“for gods sake 'LOL WUT' if there is anyone thats insane its you for even suggesting 'head shots at point blank range with a shotgun (just like in resident evil) to be 100% sure they dont live and sue.' what kind of world do YOU live in? its people like you that really p me off. my thoughts and love are with simons mum and dad and family”
by LOL WUT, Bantown
Friday, October 24 2008, 6:58PM
“Sean, the problem is if we only maim the criminals they will try and sue the police at a later date as they are now just "lovable rogues". In fact i would recommend head shots at point blank range with a shotgun (just like in resident evil) to be 100% sure they dont live and sue.”