Council says wind turbines will ruin the landscape
The views of two of Beverley's most iconic buildings could
be ruined if plans to create a wind farm are given the
go-ahead, according to East Riding Council.
The local authority warned stunning views of the Minster and
St Mary's Church would be obscured – especially from the
Westwood – if 12 huge turbines were allowed to be built at the
village of Routh.
A public inquiry into the controversial plans by RidgeWind
Ltd to site the 100m-high turbines at Hall Farm began at the
council offices in Skirlaugh yesterday.
Megan Thomas, representing the council, maintains the visual
impact would be significant and provides grounds for
refusal.
She also argued the East Riding was already set to exceed
its renewable energy targets.
Miss Thomas said: “Views of the townscape and landscape from
the Westwood are cherished views and are by no means
ordinary.
“The turbines would contrast starkly with the pastoral,
parkland nature of the Westwood.
“In light of the number of operational and consented wind
turbine schemes in the area, the need for this particular one
is not overwhelmingly compelling.
“The landscape and heritage harm can be justifiably avoided
by refusing permission.”
Local residents have also voiced concerns, with 22 of the 26
nearby households objecting to the plans.
Representative Barry Norton insisted the development would
impact on their quality of life.
In a statement submitted to the inquiry, he said: “The
impact is significant and unacceptable to the historic
landscape and views of Holderness Plain, which are protected by
local development policies.
“The turbines will be a blot on the landscape, which need
not, and should not, be there.”
But the developers claim the wind farm would bring a £5m
economic boost to the region.
David Goodman, representing RidgeWind Ltd, said any
negatives would be outweighed by the positives and there was a
need for greener forms of energy.
He told the inquiry: “It is clear the development will not
have a significant harmful effect.
“Any effects that may be adverse must be weighed with the
policy support for this form of development and the benefit it
would bring.
“It is evident those benefits far outweigh any adverse
effects.”
Meanwhile, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) has warned the
plans could endanger aircraft flying over the region.
In the Ministry's statement to the inquiry, Squadron Leader
Neal Henley said he believed the turbines could interfere with
radars, which were vital in guiding aircraft and identifying
potential threats.
He explained the Air Surveillance and Control System
(ASACS), which uses the radars, helped avoid mid-air
collisions.
Sqd Ldr Henley said: “It is assessed the proposed wind farm
developments at Hall Farm would have an unacceptable impact
upon the operations controlled by the ASACS force.
“Therefore, the MoD strongly objects to the proposed wind
farm as it will jeopardise both air surveillance and the safe
control of aircraft.”
The public inquiry into the proposed wind farm at Routh
continues.










71 Comments
View all
by Shameless Dave, Beverley
Thursday, July 03 2008, 7:35AM
“Very good point, Susan, Beverley itself will remain untainted and a wondewrful place to live, with house prices being totally unaffected! That just makes that good sized 3 bed semi with off-street parking for two or more cars within walking distance of the centre for less than 150k all the more worth while! Stanifords have the details...”
by chris, hull
Wednesday, July 02 2008, 11:29PM
“I love it all this bleating about not being able to see a building from miles away. If they love it so much why don't they visit it more and use it for its proper purpose, worship! How many of these people are practising Christians? Probably none. In a hundred years Christianity will be like a cult and most of its buildings will be gone anyway due to lack of funding.”
by John Findley, Cottingham
Wednesday, July 02 2008, 9:15PM
“Let's hope that the public enquiry throws out this proposal, who wants to see these monstrosities spoiling the view of these centuries old buildings.”
by Susan, Hornsea
Wednesday, July 02 2008, 9:01PM
“The turbines would not be built in Beverley, they would be built in Routh, the objections are not that they would obscure the view, but they would would ruin the view of the Minster from the Westwood as you travel into to Beverley. The Turbines would probably be around 17 - 18 miles beyond The Westwood. The main objectors are people who have opened holiday parks full of log cabins in Routh! NIMBEYS sad but true.”
by xcalibr, Hull
Wednesday, July 02 2008, 7:43PM
“Arthur - good idea. They could have pubs and restaurants underneath like the one in Barton upon Humber.”
by e, Beverley
Wednesday, July 02 2008, 6:57PM
“Yes, well why not go the whole hog and place them out of sight completely - underground.”
by Arthur, Hull
Wednesday, July 02 2008, 6:38PM
“Harnessing renewable energy sources like wind and tide sounds good, but why do these wind turbines have to look like the soul-less monstrosities they are. They are a blot on the landscape.
Now if they were designed like traditional windmills they'd look great.”
by e, Beverley
Wednesday, July 02 2008, 5:28PM
“Anyway, I am sure the chaps in the public inquiry will see sense and throw out this proposal. We don't need these montrosities in Beverley, it's just not cricket.”
by Astonomia, East Riding
Wednesday, July 02 2008, 5:13PM
“So wind turbines would stop the yanks flying low over the East Riding in thier F16's avoiding accidentally dropping concrete bombs on Holme-on-spalding-moor would it? - what a good idea lets have loads of them all.
As for the view of poor old Bever-york - tut tut, how, awful, oh dear that will never do, no no spoil the view from the top floor of county hall tut, tut how dare they.”
by Mick, Hull
Wednesday, July 02 2008, 5:00PM
“E beverley you must be thick! Of course it runs towards hull its tidal you moron its feeds of the river humber that leads into the sea,Go back to school!”