Hull council tenants' anger at delayed action on dangerous brickwork
FURIOUS tenants say council officials dragged their heels for months after being alerted to dangerous brickwork.
Concerns over a programme to install 900 new front doors in low-rise flats across Hull were first raised by former nurse Rob Uscroft in February.
-

UNHAPPY: Reeth Walk residents, from left, Ann Montgomery, Rob Uscroft and Ian Savage. Picture: Peter Harbour
He contacted the city council after contractors replaced wooden doors and their frames from his block of flats.
"The new door frame was considerably thinner than the old one," said Mr Uscroft, of Reeth Walk, west Hull.
Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk
View detailsOur heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.
Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk
Contact: 01858 468192
Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013
"What surprised me at the time was that nothing was done to support the existing course of brickwork above the door because the new frame was much thinner.
"Whereas the old frame had supported the bricks, the new one clearly didn't. Sure enough, bricks started popping out at three of the five flats in our block within days of the doors being fitted."
As a member of the council's Tenants Forum and a volunteer member of the forum's housing standards committee, Mr Uscroft also realised the wider implications of what had happened in his block.
"A falling brick can cause serious injury, yet here was an ongoing programme of work involving hundreds of properties where old exposed brickwork was being left unsupported," he said.
"Most of the buildings involved are more than 50 years old.
"Cement between bricks is not a glue. It is not designed to hold bricks in suspension."
A flurry of subsequent calls to the council failed to illicit a response.
"When a council housing surveyor later visited the block of flats about a separate issue I showed him the problem, he took photographs of the unsupported brickwork and said he would pass it on to the project manager," said Mr Uscroft.
"Again there was no response and it remained in a dangerous state."
Through his links with the forum, Mr Uscroft finally managed to speak to a senior housing manager in May.
After another survey, the council agreed to install supporting steel lintels.
Mr Uscroft said: "If this has happened all over Hull, it makes me wonder why I was ignored initially and how much it has actually cost to send two teams out twice to do what should have been a straightforward job."
His neighbour, Ann Montgomery, said: "There is a real communication issue here that the council needs to address.
"The current system obviously doesn't allow concerns like this from tenants to get through to the right people."
A council spokesman claimed the situation at the Reeth Walk flats was "an isolated problem".
She said: "There has been a problem with a brick being dislodged in one instance, which was resolved in July.
"Of the 900 doors that have been fitted as part of the ongoing programme there has not been any other problems.
"However, as a precaution, we are inserting a lintel above the doors of a number of properties identified as being similar to the property where there was a problem.
"When the installation of lintels is undertaken, it is done in such a way to cause minimum impact to our customers and their homes.
"The teams continue to monitor these safety requirements as part of the works."




Comments
by Mark_Hull_65
Saturday, November 03 2012, 1:04PM
“Somebody should buy the HDM photographer a new lens for xmas. That fish-eye he uses in every shot must be nearly worn out by now.
Oh... And a spirit level wouldn't go amiss either.”
by crippley
Saturday, November 03 2012, 12:43PM
“It was KWL but they wern't involved in the issue until 4 months after I began complaining.
It is really the Project Manager at Hull Council who is to blame for not addressing my concerns and not stressing to KWL the importance of fitting the lintels at the same time as the door.
The original door fitter's role was to fit the door and nothing else. A builder was tasked to fit lintels and replace loose or missing bricks as a seperate job at that 4 month point instead of the lintels being integrated with the door fitting hence he didn't get notified to do each job until after the door was fitted which meant a 10 to 12 day delay.
However for our doors fitted in february we had to wait 5 months until may when the project manager was forced to concede that there was a danger to the public.
The reason the council concede that only one brick fell is because I gave them a picture as photographic evidence which they cannot deny however I do have pictures of bricks that have fallen from above a number of other doorways which I didn't show them.”
by andy579
Saturday, November 03 2012, 11:07AM
“if it was k.w.l. did the work say no more”
by crippley
Saturday, November 03 2012, 10:53AM
“No offense taken ColonelKurz I thought it was humorous as well and my response was in the same vein”
by ColonelKurtz
Friday, November 02 2012, 11:42PM
“Crippley, I applaud your sense of humour. In hindsight the last sentence on my post was uncalled for, but was in jest and not intended to be malicious. My apologies.”
by crippley
Friday, November 02 2012, 7:37PM
“Thanks Strangely-He borrowed one from the flats
However; I've now got a picture in my head of Peter the photographer trotting round Hull and East Riding with his trusty ladder on one shoulder and his camera slung accross the other”
by Strangley
Friday, November 02 2012, 7:23PM
“Does he bring his own ladder, or borrow yours?”
by crippley
Friday, November 02 2012, 7:14PM
“Actually the reason we look so serious in the photo is that we were worried about Peter the photographer swinging from the ladder like a demented monkey trying to get the perfect angle for his shot.”
by crippley
Friday, November 02 2012, 6:57PM
“Unfortunately the door frames did support the brickwork the building was erected in the 60's when such support was allowed because the brickwork above the door is only up to 3 courses and is not structural as the letter from the council states. The metal lintel shown over my front door was put in place in June, 5 months after I reported the issue. There is Photographic evidence of fallen bricks which HDM chose not to publish, probably because it was of poor quality compared to the photo taken by the photographer, ie me vs bricks, no contest:-). 2 doors in my block were installed in September, 9 months after the start of the project (they were missed when the block had doors fitted originally in february) leaving up to 3 courses of bricks unsupported both these doors had the steel lintels fitted between 10 and 12 days after the new doors were fitted. One of these doors a brick popped out within days of the door being fitted. 2 other doors in the block had bricks fall one of them 5 bricks fell from 2 courses before lintels were fitted (I have evidence and witnesses to this). The work that was done was of very high quality the problem was that the project managers refused to accept the danger of the unsupported bricks and didn't include the lintels as part of the door installation. The photographer was actually quite short (to me anyway I'm 6ft 3" and most people are short in comparison) but you are right he was a bit like spiderman hanging precariously off a ladder to take the picture, brave lad. I'm a bit wobbly on my feet, you can't see my right hand in the photo but I was holding on to the side of the wall so I wouldn't fall flat on my face and crossing one arm is a bit difficult. I don't think the picture would have been relevant to the article if we had been grinning at the camera. As for the variation in our heights, there you have the long and short of it.
Cheers”
by unified
Friday, November 02 2012, 3:52PM
“glen i agree”