Lorry driver who killed cyclist on A1035 is spared prison
A LORRY driver who killed a cyclist as he travelled to work was driving too fast and should have slowed down.
Former Army driver David Grogan, 40, hit Tim Andrew as he cycled to work at County Hall in Beverley along the A1035 Tickton Road.
He has been spared jail after it was revealed Mr Andrew's rear light was not very bright.
Judge Simon Jack told Grogan: "You were driving a large HGV in a way that fell significantly below what is expected of a competent and careful driver."
Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk
View detailsOur heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.
Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk
Contact: 01858 468192
Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013
Grogan was convicted of causing death by careless driving by a jury at Hull Crown Court.
Grogan was driving a lorry from Brandesburton towards Beverley at the time of the accident on October 14, 2010, at 6.40am.
He claimed he had not seen the cyclist but admitted he had a smudge on the window, which affected his view of the road, but he continued his journey.
Judge Jack criticised Grogan for not addressing problems he was having with visibility through his windscreen and the speed at which he was travelling.
He also claimed the brightness of Mr Andrew's light could have contributed to the accident.
"I'm satisfied there were at least three main factors which led to the death of Mr Andrew, the first that you were aware you had a problem with your screen."
He said Grogan failed to slow down despite rain and smears on his windscreen caused by a problem with his windscreen wipers.
"The speed limit was 40mph and you should have slowed significantly below it," he said.
"You knew you had a difficulty and you didn't slow at all. Your tacograph suggested 46mph. I will give you the benefit of the doubt that you were right on the speed limit but that was too high given the circumstances due to the weather conditions and you had a problem with your windscreen."
He said the "relatively poor state" of Mr Andrew's back light was another factor.
"I'm prepared to act on the basis that his rear light was not as bright as one would have wished and that was a factor leading up to the collision, but you were not paying proper attention because, on your own evidence, you didn't see him until the last minute," said Judge Jack.
"You should have been able to pick up his bike in the beam of your headlights from 35 metres away but you never saw anything until you were a couple of metres from him.
"I'm satisfied that is because you were not paying proper attention."
Judge Jack said this was "relatively serious case of causing death by careless driving."
He said: "Mr Andrew's rear light may have contributed to the accident and, in these circumstances, I take the view that it wouldn't be just to send you straight to prison."
Grogan, of Applegarth Lane, Bridlington, was given a 12-month prison sentence, suspended for two years, and was ordered to carry out 300 hours of unpaid work.
He has been banned from driving for 18 months and given eight penalty points.
Judge Jack said: "I think this was a one-off so far as you are concerned.
"I'm confident you will be a very careful driver in the future."
He has not ordered him to pay costs after the court heard he is suffering financially as he does not have a job.
Mr Andrew, 48, of Sigglesthorne, worked as a cleaner for East Riding Council at Hornsea School and County Hall.
Mr Andrew's brother Jeff, 45, said: "Tim was a keen cyclist, it was his passion. He was happy-go-lucky and would do anything for anyone.
"He would often be helping his elderly neighbours.
"He was always a safe cyclist and even carried spare batteries in case his lights failed. He took his bike in to be serviced twice a year."






Comments
by thesnooper
Wednesday, June 20 2012, 12:25AM
“if the guy was speeding and had reduced vision because he was too lazy to stop and clean the window he should have been locked up i dont think the bike light was a factor at all, i drive plenty of miles and i manage to miss cyclists with no lights at all, he wasnt paying attention end of”
by cueball44
Tuesday, June 19 2012, 8:44PM
“I_M_RIGHT. What you really mean, IS, he is an uncouth killer who should be looking forward to wagon loads of porridge.”
by thejuggernaut
Tuesday, June 19 2012, 7:04PM
“so another pathetic sentence by another pathetic judge. that man should have been given at least 5 years it was manslaughter by dangerous driving. what the judge said as regards the cyclist is nothing short of an insult and disrespectfull to the poor cyclist and his family. i was a long distance hgv driver for 44 yrs until i retired and i finished with a clean license because i drove with a thought for other road users and pedestrians which that driver did not. He should have been jailed and at the same time judge jack should have been for the sentence and remarks he came out with. i hope the kamily put an appeal in.”
by AveTiger
Tuesday, June 19 2012, 1:56PM
“By the way, do these judges give no thought to the impact of such insensitive comments on victims' families? How would they feel if it had been their relative mown down by an arrogant irresponsible driver?”
by AveTiger
Tuesday, June 19 2012, 1:52PM
“It strikes me that as soon as you sit on a bicycle seat and start pedaling your life is worthless. The judge added to the insult of the unduly lenient sentence by blaming the victim for not having a sufficiently bright rear light. Unbelievable. It's about time the courts handed down proper sentences for causing death by dangerous or careless driving.”
by I_M_Right
Tuesday, June 19 2012, 1:36PM
“You were driving too fast, you failed to clean your windscreen, you weren't paying full attention, you killed a man - You are now free to leave.
"I'm satisfied that is because you were not paying proper attention"
That statement by the judge is enough to warrant a charge of dangerous driving (without due care and attention) resulting in another mans death.
He should have gone to prison.”
by Anna_Gram
Tuesday, June 19 2012, 1:20PM
“5trider ...
Regarding speed limits - this stretch of (single carriageway) road used to be 60mph, but has recently been reduced to 50. The limit for HGVs is 40mph on single carriageway roads, unless a lower limit is in force.
So, the report is correct - in this case it's a 40mph limit.”
by 5trider
Tuesday, June 19 2012, 12:45PM
“Perryfarrelss obviously not read the report. After doubting the accuracy of tachos, he states it's a 60mph road. The story reports he was doing 46 in a 40....”
by dascodave
Tuesday, June 19 2012, 11:52AM
“Now he's jobless and had his licence susspended for 18 months and having to do community hours does that mean he's having to cycle there?........Be careful out there on the roads matey its dangerous out there and theres an awful lot of bad drivers...”
by Neg_Dupree
Tuesday, June 19 2012, 11:46AM
“If I were the family of the cyclist I would appeal against the sentence. What's wrong with judges like this Judge Jack? Do they have problems understanding the law?”