March held in bid to save cobbles in Beverley's market place
THEY marched in their hundreds to protect the cobbles in Beverley's market place.
Today, campaigners were meeting with East Riding Council to find out if their protest has had any impact.
If not, they have vowed to sit on the cobbled setts to stop the council from starting a £2.5m town centre makeover.
Adrian Stokes, one of the Save Our Setts campaign organisers, said they are determined to make the council listen.
Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk
View detailsOur heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.
Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk
Contact: 01858 468192
Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013
He said: "My message to the council is that they have to consult properly.
"The feeling is very strong. It is pretty clear by this demonstration and the fact we have a petition signed by 860 people that we don't want to lose our setts.
"You will be surprised by the amount of people who will be willing to sit on the setts to stop the work going ahead."
It is estimated more than 500 people took part in a march yesterday from the Market Cross in Saturday Market to the East Riding Council building, County Hall, where the petition was delivered.
Protesters say the cobble setts can be seen in the first known print of the market place in 1829 and are an important part of Beverley's heritage.
East Riding Council is planning to replace the setts, which it says were laid in the 1980s, with block paving as part of plans to make the market place more pedestrian-friendly.
Civic Society history expert Professor Barbara English was invited today to meet East Riding Council about the work, which could start on Monday, January 14.
She said: "I have no idea what is going to happen at the meeting.
"My message to the council is 'please listen to us'. At the minute they are not.
"If not, the council will have a fight on their hands.
"Why destroy the setts when there are so many people who want to keep them?"
East Riding Council leader Councillor Stephen Parnaby says the majority of people are in favour of the scheme and is saddened by the protest.
He said: "The setts are a danger. People have said they don't like walking on them and people don't like pushing pushchairs on them.
"We don't have an agenda. We just want to improve the market place and make it a better visitor attraction and better for traders.
"I think when it's finished people will say 'wow, it's fantastic'."
Richard Zerry, 68, travelled from Driffield to take part in yesterday's march.
He said: "My wife is in a wheelchair and I wouldn't get rid of the setts."
Ann Mackevych, 58, of Beverley, said: "The footpaths are a disgrace but I certainly wouldn't get rid of the setts."
Among those at the front of the march was Ben Naylor, 19, who was holding a banner with his brother Daniel, which on one side said "Save Our Setts" and on the other said "ERYC Stop, Look and Listen".
He said: "I think it would be shocking to get rid of the setts.
"They've been here since 1829. They are part of Beverley."
His mother Philippa said: "The decision is bonkers.
"Historically, they fit with the style of the town and they are a perfect traffic-calming measure."
Also showing his support was Andrew Allison, Hull and East Riding co-ordinator of the Taxpayers' Alliance.
He said: "Nobody wants it. Ask people their priorities and it will be the roads that have been damaged by the floods.
"It is a vanity project."






Comments
by normktorm
Wednesday, January 09 2013, 12:41PM
“Most of the whingers attached to this nonsense come from the recently built estate on the bypass that dares to call itself Molescroft and which most of the original Beverley residents consider to be the actual ruination of Beverley. Didn't see too many of them objecting to that monstrosity.NIMBY is the word that best describes these people, a cause for a cause's sake.Get a life, it's called progress and guess what? It is inevitable.”
by democracy_now
Tuesday, January 08 2013, 6:55PM
“£2.5 million could be better spent, on maintaining the neglected road network for a start.”
by 23041642
Monday, January 07 2013, 11:44PM
“Come off it, so you think the regeneration would somehow take away Beverley's history?! It's there and won't change whatever road surface is put down even if it were flourescent pink gravel.
And who are the 'residents' you mention? All I saw protesting was a small group with kids and mothers grimly pushing buggies over the cobbles; somehow 'representative' of the silent masses?
Beverley must evolve organically. If you want it to mesh with it's 'mainly Gerorgian architecture' then I suppose you'd want to ban all forms of vehicular transport from Saturday Market? Compromise must be achieved and that involves modern materials which are asthetically pleasing. Stone setts might be pleasing but there are better alternatives.”
by TheMarketX
Monday, January 07 2013, 9:59PM
“So you'd like to see Beverley as a carbon copy of every dull, bland town with no history? You think coloured tarmac will fit into a mainly Georgian architectural backdrop?
This isn't pointless nimbyism, Nigel Leighton, Nigel Pearson and Parnaby don't give a damn what the residents of the town think. This is about a waste of resources, poor management and backscratching the few independent traders left in Beverley who quite frankly do nothing but whinge about big business but can't compete with them for customer service or price.
Some deserve to go under, I'm sick of seeing their sour faces in the local paper.”
by 23041642
Monday, January 07 2013, 9:06PM
“Beverleys 'cobbles' are a litmus of what these protesters want... to pickle Beverley in a period of time that suits their romantic view of the town. Beverley has evolved and changed to thrive and survive and the regeneration of Saturday Market must happen. The 'monstrous' Tesco has bedded into the town well enough and I bet all those NIMBY's now shop there. The joker who mourns the passing of the cattle market is oblivious to the fact that such markets were moving out of market towns all over the UK and relocated for entirely sensible reasons. Housing land must be found for future generations of young Beverlonians. It's no good having strived and bought a property pre-boom, sitting pretty, to now deny future generations just because you think it's getting overcrowded (when there are reasonable solutions to build on land). This argument is bigger than some petty little cobbles and is about an attitude of mind that towns like Beverley still need to change and move on, as it has done for hundreds of years. The simple fact is that Beverley is such a nice place no one has the right to 'bags it' as their own and not accept that such popularity will inevitabely attract more and more people to it.”
by dontwo
Monday, January 07 2013, 7:13PM
“So Mr Parnaby wants to rip em up just because some people don't like walking on them or some people don't like the effort of pushing a pram over them. What a weak pathetic excuse from the guy.. Who are these people who "dont like"?. Old chums of Mr Parnaby perhaps?..Thats if they actually exist at all. Even his claims that the setts are dangerous smacks of desperation. Exactly how many members of the public have been killed or maimed whilst walking these cobbles of death then?.
No wonder the majority dont trust him and the other councillors involved, because going by his reasons to carry out his obsession to decimate the square, it really does look like he has an agenda.
Keep it up protesters. You can hear Parnabys well over inflated ego going down like a squeaking balloon with the daft remarks he is using trying to justify the ripping up of the cobbles.”
by AstynomiaKats
Monday, January 07 2013, 7:06PM
“Spend £35,000 resurfacing the area with Tarmac and spend the rest on the potholes
report them here at Fix My Street - the can't wriggle out of saying they don't know anything about them, it in the public domain.
http://tinyurl.com/65x6kr”
by gerry_gilbert
Monday, January 07 2013, 4:35PM
“@Charleychuck: careful, lad, irony is usually lost on the green inkers who populate these boards. You could find your comments being taken seriously ;-)”
by gerry_gilbert
Monday, January 07 2013, 4:33PM
“"Also showing his support was Andrew Allison, Hull and East Riding co-ordinator of the Taxpayers' Alliance."
That's a good indicator of the type of folk behind this "protest". Barking Right Tories with a not-so-hidden neo-liberal anti-council agenda. Plus the usual retirees who really should join their local Get a Life club. It says an awful lot about the priorities of the bourgeois and petit-bourgeois burghers of Beverley that they can "protest" in their hundreds about something so irrelevant and petty.
Still, if you want to keep tradition, best dig up the tarmac roads and convert them back to rutted cart tracks...and if you don't like the rugged experience of ploughing through muddy ruts, do your shopping elsewhere.
""You will be surprised by the amount of people who will be willing to sit on the setts to stop the work going ahead." - ROTFL!! Shades of Arthur Dent lying in the squelching mud in front of the bulldozers whilst Vogons demolish the earth :)”
by CarmellaBrown
Monday, January 07 2013, 11:54AM
“the counsil spent lots of money making the streets pedestrianised in bevelry but the frost has made a lot of them shael off and its all uneven now some wise desicion that was its more dangerous than cobbles i would say”