MoD deal 'could see East Yorkshire inundated with wind turbines'

Trusted article source icon
Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Profile image for Hull Daily Mail

Hull Daily Mail

CAMPAIGNERS fear a new deal with the Ministry of Defence (MoD) could see the East Riding "inundated" with wind turbines.

The MoD objects to dozens of turbine applications every year because they interfere with the radar at RAF Staxton Wold.

  1. RAF Staxton Wold

    UPGRADE: RAF Staxton Wold, which is updating its radar system. Picture: Simon Kench

But energy company EON is paying millions of pounds for a new system it hopes will not be affected.

This will remove a barrier to its huge Humber Gateway wind farm off the East Yorkshire coast.

FREE PAIR OF LIMITED EDITION CUFFLINKS WITH EVERY FRAMED PURCHASE

Art Market

View details

Print voucher

Receive a free pair of limited edition cufflinks (worth £35.99) from one of our most esteemed artists, when purchasing a framed limited edition or a framed original piece of art.

Terms: Cufflinks selection will depend on availability. Please quote HDMVoucher and the voucher code when purchasing your piece of art.

Contact: 01482 423520

Valid until: Friday, June 07 2013

But campaigners fear it could also allow onshore turbines to spring up all over the Wolds.

Steve Hey, chairman of the No To Wolds Wind Farm Group, said: "It would be a major concern if the MoD no longer objected to turbines.

"It would open the floodgates and the Yorkshire Wolds would be inundated with turbines. Its beauty would be lost forever.

"This is being paid for by offshore industry and onshore developers are riding on their shirt-tails."

The Staxton Wold system is being upgraded from a Lockheed Martin T-101 radar to a TPS-77 produced by the same company.

Although this upgrade is being fully funded by wind farm developers, the public paid £8 million for a new radar at the site in October 2009.

Tim Fenton worked as a public relations officer for the military until 2009 and is now a member of Mr Hey's group.

He said: "Staxton Wold used to have a T-93 radar and it was upgraded to a T-101.

"It cost millions of pounds from the MoD's budget, which is taxpayers' money.

"It's a waste if you spend millions of pounds and only get a few years' use out of it."

When it considers turbine applications, East Riding Council takes MoD objections very seriously.

At a meeting last week, it objected to seven wind turbine sites across East Yorkshire.

All seven applications were then rejected by the council.

Planning committee chairman Councillor Phyllis Pollard said: "While there are interests of national security we cannot ignore them.

"We can't put the safety of residents at risk.

"We were as frustrated as everybody else and we're very sympathetic with the applicants but our hands were tied looking after the safety of our residents."

Two of the largest onshore wind farms facing MoD objections are at Thornholme Field and Fraisthorpe.

At Thornholme, near Burton Agnes, developer Wind Prospect hopes to install six 110 metre-high turbines.

And at Fraisthorpe, TCI Renewables wants to build nine 130 metre-high turbines overlooking Bridlington bay.

A spokesman for Wind Prospect said: "We welcome the work being carried out regarding offshore wind development and the Staxton Wold radar.

"It will be interesting to see whether the results translate to onshore wind development.

"Radar issues are just one of a long line of factors that wind farm developers need to examine as part of a planning application."

Testing for the new radar at Staxton Wold, near Bridlington, will begin in July next year and it should be fully installed in September the same year.

Mr Fenton said turbines pose a problem for the site's existing radar because of the speed of their blades.

"The tops of the blades move so fast they can look like a small plane," he said. "So you get a lot of clutter on the radar and it can be hard to work out what is a plane.

"This TPS-77 allows them to filter out turbine blades."

EON is paying Serco Group, an international service company, to provide the radar.

Serco has a £27 million contract to supply two TPS-77s – one at Staxton Wold and one at Brizlee Wood in Northumberland, paid for by other energy companies.

Although the radar has not yet been tested in East Yorkshire, a TPS-77 installed last year at Trimingham on the Norfolk coast has proven effective.

Serco Group chief executive Christopher Hyman said: "Serco's innovative approach is enabling the delivery of a key programme to the Ministry of Defence while helping address one of the challenges of developing wind farms in the UK.

"We are delighted that we are able to meet the needs of our customer in the Ministry of Defence while fully supporting the wider Government agenda for a low-carbon economy and greater energy security."

A spokeswoman for EON declined to comment.

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for Vindpust

    by Vindpust

    Tuesday, September 18 2012, 9:02PM

    “Correction, it is not E.ON who will be paying for this but rather the electricity consumer who is paying through the nose for Renewables Obligation subsidies which effectively double the cost of wind-generated electricity.

    Figures recorded by Ofgem show that output subsidies paid for a single typical onshore 2 MW wind turbine in the United Kingdom range from £130,000 to £470,000 per year, depending on wind resource.

    Research for a government department (BIS) shows that UK industries are paying double the amount in subsidies and 'Green taxes' than industries in other countries have to face, see: ICF International (for the Department of Business Innovation & Skills, BIS), 'An International Comparison of Energy and Climate Change Policies Impacting Energy Intensive Industries in Selected Countries' (11 July 2012).

    Downloadable from the BIS website:
    http://tinyurl.com/7bf3f68

  • Profile image for nopasaran

    by nopasaran

    Tuesday, September 18 2012, 1:53PM

    “I think I can manage to spell nimby, but please tell me how to spell global warming?”

  • Profile image for jolson16

    by jolson16

    Tuesday, September 18 2012, 11:51AM

    “JUST PUT 'TURBINES' INTO ERYC PLANNING PUBLIC ACCESS WEBSITE SIMPLE SEARCH AND YOU WILL SEE HOW MANY TURBINES COULD FLOOD ONTO THE HILLS JUST FROM THOSE IN THE PIPELINE IF IT WASN'T FOR MOD OBJECTIONS.
    LETS SEE GREG KNIGHT's PROPOSED MORATORIUM ON WIND TURBINES ON THE WOLDS ACTUALLY HAPPEN......................”

  • Profile image for MindWorp

    by MindWorp

    Tuesday, September 18 2012, 11:28AM

    “EON failed to comment, could this be because of the up & coming 9% rises to Energy Bills, the media's full of it and reckons all providers will follow suit...........

    If there is so much money floating around in these big energy corporations to be able to afford something that our Government could not in these harsh times of austerity, then surely something is up............

    Millions for an upgrade that you have already funded through tax in 2009... Soldiers are dying in Afghanistan, yet our energy bill hikes help fund an upgrade that's not needed.......

    We are sure that East Riding readers would rather have lower energy bills and have this money go towards stopping 9% increases..... If you thought you weren't paying for all this think again.

    Wonder what the 400% increased charity food parcel collectors think about an extra 9% on their bills when cannot even afford food & all whilst the extra profits made are used to perform a task that was already done in 2009...”

  • Profile image for AstonomiaSK

    by AstonomiaSK

    Tuesday, September 18 2012, 11:18AM

    “Of course the headline could read... Wind turbine brings defence benefits to the UK.

    We are getting a nice up to date radar to stop the Ruskies invading our airspace with no cost to the taxpayer.”

  • Profile image for David_Nivea

    by David_Nivea

    Tuesday, September 18 2012, 11:04AM

    “So, the speed of the turbine blades presents a radar issue for the MoD.

    Is this because the Russians are constantly probing our defences with turbo-prop engined Tupolev 'Bear' aircraft?”

  • Profile image for Bozzer

    by Bozzer

    Tuesday, September 18 2012, 8:42AM

    “Why not build the radar on a sea fort structure on Dogger Bank in the North Sea. It will give enhanced early warning and the 'island' could be a sea base to service the wind turbines which could be situated on the lee side of the radar. Prescott could run it and provide all the hot air needed for the turbines. The North Sea however might not be big enough for his ego.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article