Peter Swan: Hull City's formation is fine - it just needs Elmo and a striker
THERE’S no question that the Tigers are going through a sticky patch.
I’m not sure, though, whether a change in formation to 4-4-2 is the answer.
-

Will he be recalled?: Aaron Mclean
On Saturday, Steve Bruce again opted for the 3-5-2 formation that worked so well up to the New Year.
Barnsley mirrored that with their own 3-5-2, as have a number of clubs to cope with City.
IS YOUR CAR KEY BENT ? REMOTE FOB NOT WORKING ? LOST CAR KEYS ?...
Peace Of Mind Security Hull Ltd/Hull Car Keys
View details
FOR ALL YOUR CAR KEY NEEDS CALL US NOW ON
01482 423414
SNAPPED KEYS, LOST KEYS, KEYS LOCKED IN VEHICLES,
EXTRA KEYS
WE ALSO REPAIR 90% OF ALL REMOTES AND KEYS, NO FIX NO CHARGE.
Terms:
FREE REMOTE KEY FOB BATTERY ONE PER CUSTOMER
SAVE £3.00 WITH THIS FREE BATTERY
Contact: 01482 423414
Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013
Having sold their top striker Craig Davies to Bolton in the transfer window and with their second top scorer missing through injury, Barnsley were hardly a potent attacking threat.
Although limited, they battled hard and basically looked as though they wanted it more.
City created chances, particularly in the first half, and had they taken any one of them, would surely have gone on to win.
Instead, Barnsley took their chance and got themselves a goal.
After that they shut up shop, often defending with five or six at the back.
The fact they scored on 70 minutes through Chris Dagnall and five minutes later took him off and put on a centre-half says a lot. Once that happened, even with Bruce changing formation, the Tigers couldn’t break Barnsley down. And how many times have we seen that familiar pattern in recent weeks?
I still believe 3-5-2 is the right one for City as it does suit the team, unfortunately it’s short of a couple of pieces of the jigsaw.
To work at its best it does need a wing-back who can provide ammunition from the right. It also requires at least one striker to turn those chances into goals.
On Saturday, Bruce tried teaming Nick Proschwitz with Robert Koren up front.
Unfortunately, it didn’t really work as it was a bit too “pretty”.
I do worry, though, when I hear Bruce talking about bringing Aaron Mclean back from his loan spell at Ipswich.
With all due respect, I don’t think he is the answer to getting the Tigers ticking again.




2 Comments
by WashingtonTgr
Monday, January 28 2013, 9:27PM
“Let's face it, the Tigers haven't ticked without Aluko and Elmo. If no fresh blood is brought in up front then bringing AM back is our only option in order to freshen things up, add competition and inject some pace. He'll always win headers, run tirelessly and cause problems for defenders. Who knows what might happen if given a chance to play in his preferred position in the 3-5-2 formation alongside Simpson or Koren. Let's keep the opposition guessing!”
by fez_2
Monday, January 28 2013, 9:17PM
“Aaron is not a stop-gap, let him be; nor is it wise to stick with a sussed 3-5-2 that lacks two key players.”