£1.4m plans to demolish and replace rotting Gypsy site approved
PLANS for a £1.4 million Gypsy camp have been rubber-stamped by council planners.
Travellers in Bridlington are delighted the three-year wait for a decision on the Woldgate site is finally over.
It was delayed by demands for a second public exhibition after objectors said they had not been properly consulted about proposals to demolish the rotting camp and build a new one.
But only 31 people looked at the plans when they were shown at St Mark's Church Centre, Bessingby Gate, earlier this month.
Bridlington-based East Riding Councillor Chad Chadwick, who had demanded the extra consultation, said only one objector from the housing estate next to the planned development had attended the exhibition.
Most of the initial objections had been about litter and trespassing.
Mr Chadwick said: "In the years we have lived near the site, we have had no complaints. And anyone can throw tyres in ditches, it's not necessarily Gypsies."
Lindsey Jones, of Gypsy campaign group Hidden Voices, said: "I'm really pleased it's been passed, it was the only proper outcome. Anything else would have been devastating for the local community.
"The people have known since 2007 that we had the money, but we were starting to wonder if it would ever happen.
"It's positive that so few people went to the exhibition. It shows there isn't really opposition to the site."
Despite public apathy, Carnaby Parish Council had urged planners to reject the application, or at least demand that a steel fence be put around it. In the end, there was no such condition.
Ms Jones said: "I don't understand where they're coming from with the fence idea. It wouldn't make it blend in very well.
"With a fence, it would look like a prison or something. It would make them look different straightaway."
At yesterday's planning meeting councillors were told it was the last chance to access Government money to improve the site.
The deadline from the Department For Communities And Local Government was extended at the end of last year.








5 Comments
by Mark, my words
Saturday, February 26 2011, 2:52AM
“Yes you do need a permanent adress, but it doesn't have to necessarily yours, it could just be a friend who does have a permanent address.”
by Mark, my words
Saturday, February 26 2011, 2:51AM
“Contribute nothing? Do they not pay duty on fuel, tobacco, alcohol or VAT on anything else?
If being a traveller means not paying any tax on anything, then I'll order my caravan tomorrow.”
by Fantastic Voyager, Hull:
Friday, February 25 2011, 1:18PM
“In order to travel on the road, one must have a permanent address for driving licence purposes. It must be extremely inconvenient for the travellers to have keep constantly updating their details.”
by Steve, Hull
Friday, February 25 2011, 12:35PM
“Nuts!!
All we hear about is cuts, cuts and more cuts, people losing their jobs, people losing their homes and yet the council see's fit to waste over a million quid whilst care homes housing some of our elderly war heroes are closing.
There's only one question I would like answered. Who's on the make here? Who are getting the bungs?”
by Anon, West Hull
Friday, February 25 2011, 11:40AM
“Hang on....
So those of us who pay our taxes and contribute are getting all our services cut, and having to suffer, whereas Travellers who contribute NOTHING are being given a new £1.4m site?
It's just not right.
Also, I assumed the whole point of being a traveller was that you travelled, not pitched up and stayed at a static site, is that not then technically a house and should be subject to the same rates, etc.?”