Public have say on Holderness turbines

Trusted article source icon
Thursday, March 18, 2010
Profile image for This is HullandEastRiding

This is HullandEastRiding

Residents have urged the planning inspector heading the latest inquiry into a wind farm proposal in Holderness to listen to their views.

The inquiry is looking into plans by Renewable Energy Systems (RES) to build nine turbines at Roos.

The inquiry began last week at County Hall in Beverley and finished yesterday.

East Riding Council's planning committee had thrown out the application due to visual impact, the effect on the character of the rural area and the cumulative impact.

The public were given the chance to air their views at Roos Memorial Hall this week.

Representing Rimswell and Roos parish councils, Jim McWatt warned the impact on the community would be harmful.

He said: "We have one of the fastest eroding coastlines in the world and have many renewable projects here.

"We think about climate change every day.

"But we do not worry about Government targets. We live here and know what we can absorb.

"We believe this is an application too far. Holderness, as an area, is full."

Mr McWatt, chairman of Rimswell Parish Council, also warned that such developments will impact on tourism.

He said: "Tourism is the life blood of the area and in this current financial climate it would be criminal to deny them their main income."

He also claimed noise is a major issue with at least 26 properties set to suffer unacceptable levels from the turbines.

South Holderness Opposes Wind Turbines (SHOWT) chairwoman Cherie Blenkin questioned the environmental assessment carried out by the RES.

"The impact on footpaths and bridal ways have not been adequately assessed and the development is in an area which is harmful to the landscape character.

"RES has also failed to carry out proper consultation with residents

"Please do not deny us a voice. We would urge the inspector to take our concerns into account and overrule.

"We want to work with the wind farm industry to tackle climate change but we won't stand by and let our villages be harmed."

RES has insisted there needs to be consistency as other similar developments have been successful on appeal.

Yesterday, conditions were agreed between the parties should the development be given the go ahead and closing submissions were heard.

A decision on the appeal is expected within the next few months.

7
Tweet this article
Report

7 Comments

  • Profile image for This is HullandEastRiding

    by David, Hull

    Thursday, March 25 2010, 4:41PM

    “I know some people who went to this inquiry to speak in favour. How is it their viewpoint is never given in these reports?”

  • Profile image for This is HullandEastRiding

    by Ranter, Hull.

    Thursday, March 18 2010, 6:05PM

    “"He also claimed noise is a major issue with at least 26 properties set to suffer unacceptable levels from the turbines."
    Ahh, what he didnt mention, was this includes 5 pig sties. 3 anderson air raid shelters, 3 abandoned cottages, 2 haystacks, and an outside toilet.”

  • Profile image for This is HullandEastRiding

    by Simon, Anlaby

    Thursday, March 18 2010, 5:39PM

    “Dave,
    The Croda one is visible from the top of Tranby Lane on a clear day, so they are a blot on our landscape as well! The noise is also a problem, plus my TV flickers and local ramblers don't like it. Oh and I can't go to Beresford Park in case I get hit by flying ice blocks.”

  • Profile image for This is HullandEastRiding

    by Jill, Beverley

    Thursday, March 18 2010, 4:58PM

    “I think whatever our own views on if these things are needed or are just a farce,do not matter on this one.
    I do personally think Roos shouldn't have to be lumbered with two farms though,plus one a kilometre away at Burton Pidsea.Lets space them all out a bit”

  • Profile image for This is HullandEastRiding

    by Dave, Hull

    Thursday, March 18 2010, 3:02PM

    “Simon in Anlaby seems to be in favour. Is that because they will be nowhere near him?”

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters