Redesign of River Hull mill project begins
THE developer behind a £80m scheme earmarked for a Hull city
centre site next to Drypool Bridge is rethinking its
design.
Earlier this month, planning councillors agreed to defer a
decision on the proposed Manor Mill complex overlooking the
River Hull.
They put the decision on ice to allow North Ferriby-based
developer Manor Property Group more time to respond to respond
to criticisms over the scheme's design.
It currently features five different buildings, including a
main 23-storey tower block.
If given the go-ahead, the development will include
apartments, student accommodation, a hotel and a casino, a
doctor's surgery and a convenience store, along with new public
areas along the riverfront.
Approval would also trigger the demolition of the derelict
former Clarence Mill buildings, originally developed on the
three-acre site in the late 19th century by flour milling
pioneer Joseph Rank.
Some historians have called for at least some of the old
mill to be retained as part of any new development although
most councillors appear to accept full demolition is
unavoidable.
Instead, they voiced most of their concerns over the design
of the proposed new buildings with many labelling them inferior
in quality to the recently-approved Boom residential and office
development further along the east bank of the River Hull.
Malcolm Scott, an agent for Manor Property Group, said:
“Having taken onboard the planning committee's comments, we are
making the changes we understood the committee wanted to
see.
“We will be presenting to council officers this week with a
view to representing to the planning committee by August at the
latest.”










12 Comments
View all
by Brewski92
Wednesday, July 27 2011, 11:58PM
“How can anyone define clarence mills as an "eyesore"?! Its an absolutely amazing building and in my opinion should be kept, just adapted to suit its new use. There's too much history in that place to just throw away just so that some businessman can save a few quid. Yes turn it into what is planned but demolishing and starting again would be such a massive waste. Plus the amount of land taken up around the mill itself by decrepid offices and warehouses would probably be more than enough to house this new development leaving the mill left for other uses.”
by Peter, Saudi Arabia
Friday, June 20 2008, 3:35PM
“Would you put a full stop to it Paul? I am breathless after reading that.”
by paul, hull
Thursday, June 19 2008, 10:21PM
“I think it would be a crying shame to demolish yet another building in hull with historic connection and all thought i embrace new build as well there is a place for it and a place not this is a place not renovation was done on the pease warehouse this mill is hugh im sure it could be saved in some way and developed as apartments still come on council lets have a rethink herebig style”
by kevin, e yorks
Thursday, June 19 2008, 9:05PM
“that brick block of an eyesore should be demolished immeidiatly,like a lot of other eyesores in hull,we should be looking to build and create more dynamic and taller buildings for hull,like most forward thinking citys,im all for great architecture like ferens art gallery or the city hall,but the rank hovis is horrible,come on manor come up with some good designs,this can only be built once,and great idea having a mixed use building,if ther are to be apartments in the 23 storey building,please make sure they have good balconeys,if i lived in a highrise i would like a balconey to get some freshair,and they will sell better.”
by Isabel, East Hull
Thursday, June 19 2008, 2:23PM
“I agree with you Jamie L. The city planners seem hell bent on picking up where the Luftwaffe left off. Enough of Hull's architectural heritage has been lost already. It will be really sad to lose more of our familiar landmarks but I fear that no one in the planning department is listening to the people who live here. Ivory towers and all that!”
by Peter, Saudi Arabia
Thursday, June 19 2008, 1:54PM
“By the looks of it, they are going to have a 25 storey (top of roof) plastic and glass tube on the corner of the existing brick building.
I should imagine all the aviation authorities have been consulted for their thoughs and safety observations / recommendations?.
Then all the residents along St Peter St can be flying high, including the refuge next door and overlooked. No wonder a surgery and previously reported pharmacy is required on site. This will stop em all limping to Holderness Rd. Scotts Living hey Malcolm.
How many more casinos are on the drawing boards for Hull?”
by Steve, Hull
Thursday, June 19 2008, 1:30PM
“Does anyone care?”
by naked civil servant, hull
Thursday, June 19 2008, 10:59AM
“The point is alan, refurbished as what?? this word keeps getting used but no actual suggestions as to what you can do with it.. Its Huge, with 18 inch thick brick walls, so id say options are strictly limited. You can hardly bung a few windows in and turn it into flats can you. Where would the running costs come from to turn it into an Arts or indoor climbing centre. It would have to be subsidised to the hilt. I think we have to be realistic here.”
by naked civil servant, hull
Thursday, June 19 2008, 10:39AM
“Whilst I agree that old buildings have character the cost of refurbishing or adapting a huge brick structure like the Mill must be huge. What can it be used for? Who will foot the bill ? I havnt read anywhere of any developer putting money up to preserve the Mill, so bring on the new development.”
by Alan, North Lincolnshire
Thursday, June 19 2008, 10:32AM
“As a person who has long links with Hull I have to say the city seems hell bent on destroying its past. A building like that refurbished could be an asset to the city plus it stands as a historic link to the Rank name”