Spared prison by his victims: Hull man who smashed his way into elderly couple's home with fire extinguisher and demanded cash
A MAN who smashed his way into an elderly couple's home before demanding cash has avoided jail after his victims accepted his apology.
Lewis Burns, 21, used a fire extinguisher to break a window at the couple's home in Thornton Court, a sheltered housing complex in west Hull.
-

COMMUNITY ORDER: Lewis Burns, 21, has avoided a jail sentence.
During a previous hearing, Burns had been warned he faced four years behind bars.
But in the first case of its kind, Judge Mark Bury delayed sentencing him for six months to see if he could keep out of trouble.
DISCOUNTED HALF TERM SPECIAL OFFER ON 4 BERTH LUXURY MOTORHOME...
View detailsDUE TO A CANCELLATION WE HAVE A BRAND NEW 2013 TRIBUTE 625 AVAILABLE FOR THE HALF TERM HOLIDAYS (SAT 25TH MAY TO SUN 2ND JUNE). 7 NIGHTS WOULD USUALY BE £650! GET 8 OR 9 NIGHTS FOR ONLY £65 P/NIGHT
Terms:
THIS OFFER IS SUBJECT TO YORKSHIRE MOTORHOME HIRE'S USUAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS (SEE WEBSITE FOR DETAILS)
CALL 01482 887641 FOR MORE INFO
Contact: 01482 423069
Valid until: Saturday, May 25 2013
It also gave the couple, both in their seventies, time to decide their tormentor's fate.
Last night, the woman, who asked not to be named, said: "I have forgiven him for what he has done. I accept his apology.
"He is only young and it sounds like he has been a good kid before. I have children and I wouldn't have liked to have seen them go to prison at that age.
"Hopefully, this will teach him a lesson."
Judge Bury asked police to contact the woman and the man, aged 73 and 78, to see if they would be willingly to meet Burns, who carries out voluntary work for the elderly, and accept his apology.
Although the victims were too distressed by the burglary to meet Burns, a father who had no previous convictions, they agreed to spare him prison after hearing how he had been able to keep out of trouble.
Judge Bury told Burns: "I gave you a marvellous opportunity to prove yourself and, through no fault of yours, you have not had the opportunity of doing that because, as a result of the publicity surrounding this case, you were sacked and you have not been able to save up any compensation.
"Despite preliminary suggestions these two unfortunate victims would be prepared to see you they have not in any event decided to do that.
"I have no criticism, one can well understand their sense of terror at this offence. It seems to me you would have been able to give them some encouragement about the sort of person you are and the totally isolated nature of this offence.
"It is important you have not reoffended. I will honour the promise I made to you back in June.
"If you do not comply with the order then I will send you to prison. You can put this rather sorry period of your life behind you and live a law-abiding future, hopefully in work.
"The seriousness of the offence merits a prison sentence in the region of four years and that is what you can expect if you do not comply."
Burns earlier told the Mail he wanted to apologise to his victims in person. He said he had no memory of the burglary and only found out what he had done when he was contacted by police.
Burns said: "I couldn't believe I had done something like that and I felt so sorry for the victims.
"There are no words to describe what I have done.
"I just want to apologise as much as I can."
Burns, of the Boulevard, west Hull, was given a 12-month community order and ordered to carry out 250 hours of unpaid work.
Addressing Judge Bury, Burns' barrister Paul , said: "His victims agreed to see him but subsequently had second thoughts and decided against it. He has managed to stay out of trouble."
Burns had been drinking in the city centre and mixed his medication with alcohol prior to breaking into the house.
Burns, who has since been dismissed as a fitter at Shipham Valves, covered his face with a jumper, switched off the complex's CCTV system before breaking in.
The couple were woken by the noise and Burns repeatedly demanded they hand over their money.
It was only when they threatened to call the police that he ran off.
He was caught after leaving his blood at the scene.
Samples matched his DNA kept on the police national database, which he had been placed on in 2005 after receiving a caution.
It is the same sheltered housing complex that has been repeatedly targeted by thief and menace Aisha Delaney, who has now been given an Asbo banning her from the flats to give the residents some respite.
Burns pleaded guilty to the burglary, which happened on February 4, at Hull Crown Court.
10




Comments
by BigJohn
Wednesday, December 19 2012, 6:27AM
“"I want to apologise. I am really sorry I got caught".”
by Preebo
Wednesday, December 19 2012, 1:57AM
“"It was only when they threatened to call the police that he ran off."
OH NO! NOT THE POLICE!!!!......Spare me please!
Judge Burns: As a punishment, why not give him time in the comfy chair? It will do about as much good as your sentence.”
by ArthurHunt
Monday, December 17 2012, 10:03PM
“TH elderly couple come from the 'decent generation' - brought up properly, polite and forgiving. Everyone else is more streetwise, the signals this judge has sent is quite clear - apologise (words, words, words) - tell a good sob story, put on a good act and you get away with it.
The people I really pity are of course this lad's family - probably very decent and totally embarrassed.
Similar sympathies go to the families of people named in the Court File, if we're going to publish Court cases, let's have all the civil court cases published too - like County Court Judgements for debt......”
by dontwo
Monday, December 17 2012, 8:23PM
“This thugs victims were elderly, maybe a bit naive and confused, even influenced perhaps to accept this thugs "apology".
Did they perhaps feel some misplaced pity for this "youngster"?. He certainly didnt feel sorry for them when he targeted them did he?.
Wait till Burns goes off on one again. Maybe his next victims wont be as lucky.
The option should never have been given to the elderly couple. The thugs fate should have been solely decided by the judge and the law, not influenced by his elderly victims accepting the thugs apology or not.
Judge Bury was wrong to put the onus on the elderly couple. Because they seem decent people, they knew they would have felt guilty if they had chosen the correct option by telling Burns to stuff his apology and they knew they would have felt guilt and somehow responsible when he was given the prison sentence he really deserved.”
by dannydarko222
Monday, December 17 2012, 7:05PM
“I just amazed Fatboy's a father ?
TBH I would have reckoned even Jimmy Savile would have thought he looked a little young ?”
by profanity
Monday, December 17 2012, 6:47PM
“I am quite sure that with a soupcon more air let in, that fat lad would explode.”
by localad
Monday, December 17 2012, 6:32PM
“Judge Bury is a bloody mindless idiot to put this elderly couple in that position, disgrace to the profession as a judge, not that it has much status these days.
Judge Bury told Burns: "I gave you a marvellous opportunity to prove yourself and, through no fault of yours, you have not had the opportunity of doing that.
Bury, what do you mean through no fault of his, he burgled and terrorised an elderly couple, of course its his fault, buffoon.”
by Demonica666
Monday, December 17 2012, 5:56PM
“What a dreadful responsibility to put on an elderly and vulnerable couple. So, if they accept this idiots apology, he goes free, but if they do not, they are basically to blame for giving him a criminal record? Judge Bury should be sacked. His ridiculous suggestion that this couple meet Burns was refused by the couple who were too scared and traumatised. This in itself, should have been enough for 'Judge' Bury to hand down an appropriate sentence. This is truly appalling.”
by Dave_Navarro
Monday, December 17 2012, 3:54PM
“Anyone know the old couple's address, I may as well go and rob them if they let e go when I get caught. - What a complete joke”
by notrequired
Monday, December 17 2012, 3:30PM
“why put the onus on to an elderly fragile couple. Judges are supposed to set sentences.”