St Mary's College take open-top bus to protest over Hull City Council plans to cut free school transport

Trusted article source icon
Thursday, March 07, 2013
Profile image for Hull Daily Mail

Hull Daily Mail

THEY braved the rain and wind to make sure their voices were heard.

Pupils from St Mary's College took their fight against school transport cuts to the Guildhall – aboard an open top bus.

  1. PLEA:   St Mary's College  pupils took their  protest to the Guildhall.  Picture: Kate Woolhouse

    PLEA: St Mary's College pupils took their protest to the Guildhall. Picture: Kate Woolhouse

Waving banners and cheering loudly, pupils were given a warm reception during the 20-minute journey through the streets of Hull as members of the public clapped, beeped and waved their support.

The 25 youngsters wanted to personally deliver a 700-name petition against council plans to axe non-compulsory free school transport.

Family Wildlife Discovery Offer

RSPB Blacktoft Sands

View details

Print voucher

Come and discover the wildlife at Blacktoft Sands nature reserve for just £6. Offer includes entry for 2 adults and up to 3 children, binocular hire and activities for children. Normal value £12.

Terms: Redeem voucher at visitor reception during opening hours, 9am to 5pm. Only, one pair of binoculars per voucher, customers will need to leave car keys as a deposit for binoculars.

Contact: 01405 800024

Valid until: Saturday, June 15 2013

St Mary's in Cranbrook Avenue would be one of the worst affected as it has a city-wide catchment because of its Catholic faith.

Newland School for Girls is also petitioning against the cuts and it, too, has a city wide catchment as a single-sex school.

Angela Ogilvie, assistant head with responsibility for safeguarding at St Mary's, said: "We are doing what we are doing because we are really passionate about the children and this would have a detrimental effect.

"The children are upset and worried about their future and if their parents will be able to afford to send them.

"We are already seeing so many other pressures on

families.

"We would lose so much. As a teacher at the school, I see such a diverse range of students and we would lose the essence of the school.

"It is classed as outstanding so we have been told we are doing things right, so why change that.

"Why not be an innovative city which puts children first?

"I would say to the council, be brave, be bold, be the only council prepared to say we want to put the children and education first."

As the bus travelled through the city centre, lunchtime shoppers stopped to wave.

Pulling up outside the Guildhall, the pupils then took the petition to reception.

Kerri Bell, 16, a pupil at St Mary's, said: "I think it is very bad because people may want to come to this school but will not be able to travel.

"The bus to the Guildhall was really good. We got a few honks and were able to raise awareness."

Kira Agnew, 16, said: "It is unfair children have to pay, especially in these economic times.

"Going through town was fun and it raised awareness and got more people realising what is going on."

Julie Holgate has a daughter in Year 9 and lives in the east of the city.

Her daughter would have to catch two buses to the schools.

She said: "Our main concerns are the safety aspects of removing the bus service.

"As parents, we feel the same way and hope by raising awareness it will work."

The city council has a legal duty to provide transport to pupils who go to their nearest school, but who live more than three miles away for secondary pupils and two miles for primary pupils.

It must also provide transport for children with special educational needs and low-income families – classed as those pupils on free school meals.

There are 1,900 pupils who get free transport, at a cost of about £386 each per year.

About half of them would be affected if all non-compulsory free transport is cut, meaning the council could save about £366,000.

The council launched the consultation in January.

Parents have been invited to a series of meetings to have their say.

The consultation will end on Wednesday, April 10, and a report will be sent to cabinet on May 20.

5
Tweet this article
Report

5 Comments

  • Profile image for mechanical

    by mechanical

    Thursday, March 07 2013, 2:27PM

    “burglaralarm, the local council lost a large amount of funding due to the amount of local schools turning into academies and trusts. These academies are not buying into services previously supplied to the school by the local council. This means that a lot of services that used to support the education in the city are struggling with funding and being lost.
    So I am suggesting that as these academies have opted out of local authority control and have choose not to work with the local authority, so why should the local authority fund the non-compulsory transport.

    Again I am not saying you pupils can not have free non-compulsory transport, I am saying why should the council fund this in academies and trusts.

    Oh and by the way I have got up and done something about this. Just because I don't go shouting about it to the papers it does not mean I have not done something about it.”

  • Profile image for burglaralarm

    by burglaralarm

    Thursday, March 07 2013, 1:20PM

    “Some people just dont get it !!! This is not just about SMC other schools are also affected Its just that they care enough to try to make a difference. I should know All of my children go there and lo and behold I work and I live within walking distance, so do not need a bus but do not see why those who do should be penalised. Kids today take enough flack for not turning up and being disruptive lets not make it any easier for them to bunk off. Also Yes St Marys is an Academy and a very well run one hence why I chose that school for my children. If you are all so against why not get up and do something instead of moaning...St Marys have put their money where their mouth is and yes it is our money and I for one think its well spent! End results can only speak for themselves and my children have in the pastand are still coming out with excellent results what else could we ask for !!!”

  • Profile image for mechanical

    by mechanical

    Thursday, March 07 2013, 12:47PM

    “St Mary's college is actually an academy and has opted out of local authority control. Why should the council pay to transport non-compulsory academy pupils, when they have opted out. I am not saying you can't have free transport, I am saying why should the council pay for it.

    You can have free transport, just get the academy buy into the service from the local authority or in St Mary's case get the Catholic church to fund the non-compulsory transport.

    It seems to me that this is the elephant in the room and Hull City Council will not come out and say this even though it would gain support from the majority of its tax payers. Also it makes sense.”

  • Profile image for Avondaler

    by Avondaler

    Thursday, March 07 2013, 11:40AM

    “Why not keep the buses running, but charge the pupils to use them - best of both worlds then! Other parents in Hull have to pay for their children to use the school buses - why should St Mary's be any different. If you want your children to go to a specific school, then look into the costs before you choose it. It's not my job as a taxpayer to fund your children getting to school.”

  • Profile image for hullboi81

    by hullboi81

    Thursday, March 07 2013, 11:06AM

    “If you want your child to go to a specific school in the city... PAY YOURSELF or MOVE NEARER !

    Stop expecting the working people to keep footing the bill for your kids..

    if you cant afford kids, then don't have them !!”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         

        Related articles

         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article