Friday, March 15 2013, 3:57PM
“john1947
Haven't we already been through this?
What about people who get hurt in car accidents? Should we bill them for their health care if they are proved to be at fault? Including pedestrians who walk out in front of buses without looking?
And people who are injured playing sports including riding horses.
Or walkers/climbers who are injured while walking/climbing and have to be rescued.
And people who go swimming/boating and have to be rescued by the coast guard?
And I think we should bill criminals for the time spent by the police in catching them, before we even look at the costs of solicitors, barristers, judges, ushers and juries. And before we even think about charging them for their stay in prison and the probation staff who have to monitor them after they are released on license.”
Friday, March 15 2013, 4:45PM
“It is common practice for the insurance companies to set aside any part of compensation that can be attributed to a claimants fault, whether in sport or such as motoring accidents. Why not therefore treat drunks and troublemakers in the same way? There are legal provisions for the gains made by criminal activity to be seized.”
“The politicians are making a big thing about the minimum pricing of alcohol. Surely this is the wrong way to stop the problems of health and unruly behaviour and penalise those who drink moderately. Will it stop the problems anyway? I think not. What might be effective would be to make abusers of alcohol pay for NHS treatment and the cost of Police, Ambulance and Fire services. As far as I know, being drunk and disorderly is still a criminal offence. Why aren't offenders charged and brought before a Magistrate? Also, those bars, etc that make the big profits from selling the booze should be made to contribute to the costs of dealing with continued incidents outside their premises.”